Features

Read. Assess. Compare. Interpret with context.

Move from quick orientation to peer-review-informed assessment, dialogic questioning, and source comparison while keeping interpretation researcher-led.

Detection
Detection

Bring research in without breaking your workflow

Analyze what is already in front of you through screen capture, a file, pasted text, or a DOI. Syllogos fits the way researchers read instead of asking them to restructure the document or leave the page.

  • Screen, PDF, DOI, file, and pasted-text inputs
  • Academic content recognized across applications
  • Researcher-controlled fetch, capture, and dismissal
Syllogos
Syllogos overlay detecting a captured research paper
Retrieval
Retrieval

Assess the study in its strongest available form

Syllogos resolves published metadata and available full text, then uses structured extraction when needed. The goal is not merely to read what is visible, but to assemble enough of the source for a responsible evaluation.

  • DOI and published-source retrieval
  • Structured extraction for difficult documents
  • Direct support for full papers and reports
Syllogos
Syllogos new-analysis view with DOI lookup and file upload
Analysis

From quick orientation to full multidimensional assessment.

Context and key points orient the reading. Focused workflows examine methods, contribution, coherence, sources, and bias; Full Assessment integrates all ten CRAF dimensions into one explained report for the researcher to review.

Fast
Summarize Context

Question, method, findings, and limitations.

Fast
Extract Key Points

Claims, findings, figures, and conclusions.

Deep
Methods & Validity

Methodological rigor and scientific validity.

Deep
Novelty & Contribution

Originality and scholarly contribution.

Deep
Coherence & Clarity

Theoretical consistency and writing quality.

Deep
Sources & Peer Review

Reference reliability and peer-review status.

Deep
Bias & Legitimacy

Objectivity, reflexivity and implicit legitimacy.

Deep
Full Assessment

One integrated report across all 10 dimensions.

CRAF 4.0
CRAF 4.0

Ten dimensions. Five bands. One integrated assessment.

CRAF 4.0 evaluates methodological rigor, scientific validity, originality, theory, literature, sources, writing, peer-review status, reflexivity, and ethical or institutional standards. The score is only one part of the result; explanations, evidence, strengths, weaknesses, and limitations provide the necessary context.

  • Ten connected dimensions of research quality
  • Five quality bands across a 0–10 scale
  • Explanations, evidence, strengths, and limitations
  • Questions that deepen scholarly reading
Syllogos
Syllogos CRAF 4.0 action menu over a captured paper
Labs · Beta
Labs · Beta

Question the assessment from five perspectives

The dialogic window recognizes that research cannot be evaluated from one final viewpoint. Engage through Positivist, Post-Positivist, Constructivist, Critical, and Pragmatist approaches.

  • Five fundamental research paradigms
  • Questions grounded in the source and assessment
  • A dialogic rather than mechanical evaluation
Syllogos
Syllogos Labs, a conversational Q&A panel over a loaded research paper
Dashboard
Dashboard

See patterns across the literature you assess

Each assessment contributes to a broader view of fields, quality bands, confidence levels, and recurring ideas. Over time, separate readings become a more coherent picture of your research landscape.

  • Field distribution and quality-band patterns
  • Confidence breakdown and keyword trends
  • Filter by time period and discipline
Syllogos
Syllogos Insights dashboard with research profile and trends
Power users
Power users

Open, capture, and assess without interruption

Global shortcuts show or hide Syllogos, capture the source in front of you, and control background detection. The interface stays available without taking the researcher away from the material being evaluated.

  • Global shortcuts for detection, visibility, capture
  • In-app shortcuts for bookmark, dismiss, rerun
  • Number keys for direct action triggers
Syllogos
Syllogos settings showing the keyboard shortcuts panel
Library
Library

Keep each assessment connected to its source

Save each result with its action, confidence, date, quality profile, and reasoning intact. Export the report when the evaluation needs to be discussed, compared, or carried into later research.

  • One-click bookmarking on any result
  • Color-coded cards by action type
  • Markdown, PDF, clipboard, and share-link exports
Syllogos
Syllogos Saved Research library with bookmarked analyses
Principles of assessment

Four commitments that keep assessment transparent

The platform supports research evaluation while the researcher remains responsible for interpretation.

01

Evidence

Reasoning is organized so every conclusion can be inspected.

02

Transparency

Strengths, weaknesses, limitations, and possible bias remain visible.

03

Plurality

Five paradigms reveal how perspective shapes scholarly evaluation.

04

Researcher responsibility

Interpretation and research decisions remain with the researcher.

Democratizing Research

Bring a study. Examine it with structured, peer-review-informed criteria.

Start freeExplore Assessment

Free to start. No credit card required.